“This a photograph taken from the teenager (shirtless guy) named Austin Schafer’s Twitter account, of a kid being tied up and beaten by upper classmen at Columbia High School in Nampa, Idaho.
This is a recent photograph and one where the school’s authorities have not taken action yet. Remember this kid’s name and repost this picture.
The Neanderthal trash who are bullying him deserve to have this picture plastered all over the Internet for prospective college admission offices to see so their career pinnacle can be asking me which kind of soup I want at Olive Garden.
If you’ve been a victim of bullying or know someone who has, please repost.”
I hate people.
What the fuck is wrong with people.
you are all way bigger pieces of shit than you apparently think this kid is. He looks terrified. You fuckers disgust me.
Signal Boost. I think everyone who sees this should call the school.
I’ve got 2,400 followers on here. You all know what to do… reblog the shit out of this.
what the actual fuck. when will people realize that bullying is NOT okay, and it never will be. it’s cruel, and sick. if you bully people i reserve the deepest circle of hell for you bastards.
Oh my god, the bruise on his stomach… I usually don’t reblog these kinds of things but this is just too far.
are you fucking kidding me. when will people realize that bullying isn’t right? it does nothing except hurt someone in the end, possibly even others…knowing this from experience… this absolutely DISGUST me.
Don’t you DARE scroll past this. Yes you.
Ok, I’m sorry but 77k notes is not enough. This cruel and sick. More people need to know about this.
why is it that were always told not to get tattoos at a young age because we “will regret it later on” when we are basically told to choose a career path by age 18? i’d rather be 40 years old with a tattoo that meant something to me when i was young than be 40 years old not wanting to get out of bed to go to a job that i hate because i was forced to decide on a career in my teens
If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also
This specifically refers to a hand striking the side of a person’s face, tells quite a different story when placed in it’s proper historical context. In Jesus’s time, striking someone of a lower class ( a servant) with the back of the hand was used to assert authority and dominance. If the persecuted person “turned the other cheek,” the discipliner was faced with a dilemma. The left hand was used for unclean purposes, so a back-hand strike on the opposite cheek would not be performed. Another alternative would be a slap with the open hand as a challenge or to punch the person, but this was seen as a statement of equality. Thus, by turning the other cheek the persecuted was in effect putting an end to the behavior or if the slapping continued the person would lawfully be deemed equal and have to be released as a servant/slave.
THAT makes a lot more sense, now, thank you.